Does Hamlet show that people in the 16th Century are just like us?

Shakespeare depicts Hamlet in a way that is very psychologically real, which indeed makes connections to modern day society. Hamlet addresses multiple ‘taboo’ subjects, such as atheism and mental health, which allow modern audiences make connections with 16th Century beliefs and behaviour. But how much are people in the 16th Century really like us? 

One difference I first explored when comparing people from the 16th Century to modern day experiences was atheism. Not believing in God in the 16th Century was one of the biggest sins one could commit… According to 16th century jurist Jean Bodin: “Witchery was atheism, and atheism was the biggest crime and sin.” Also, according to English cleric and Cambridge theologian William Perkins: “Witchery universally did not exist, but had an anti-Christian character, and included rejecting baptism and apostasy.” This belief on atheism almost detaches a modern audience from connecting with 16th Century people, as this could be seen as an extremely old fashioned view. According to sociologist Phil Zuckerman, broad estimates of those who have an absence of belief in a deity range from 500 to 750 million people worldwide. Other estimates state that there are 200 million to 240 million self-identified atheists worldwide, with China and Russia being major contributors to those figures. Sociologists  Ariela Keysar and Juhem Navarro-Rivera’s review of numerous global studies on atheism, state there are 450 to 500 million positive atheists and agnostics worldwide (7% of the world’s population). This highlights how much views have changed over time, which stimulates the thought that we aren’t very similar to the people in the 16th Century. 

However, Shakespeare denotes the subject of mental health presented in multiple characters within Hamlet, including Gertrude, Opheilia and Hamlet himself. This is often a subject that a modern audience can identify with. Although, societies views and opinions on mental illness were significantly different in the 16th Century. People with psychological disorders were seen as dangerous so they were locked up to protect society and there was an increase in mortality rate. In the 16th and 17th centuries, people were obsessed with the concept of mental illness. 

This is evident throughout Shakespeare’s plays, but is especially apparent throughout his play Hamlet. Madness is one of the most pervasive themes in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Several of the characters in Hamlet could be considered mad. Most notably, Hamlet and Ophelia characterise the idea of madness in this play. The madness displayed by each of these characters is driven, in part, by the deaths of their fathers, however they each portray madness in different ways even though their madness is driven by similar origins. The madness of each of these characters ultimately ends in tragedy. This is perhaps also an outdated view of the taboo topic relating mental health. However, symptoms that Hamlet and Ophelia demonstrate can be applied to modern day behaviours, making us question if we actually are just like the people in the 16th Century. Another character that can be construed as mad in Hamlet is Ophelia. Ophelia is portrayed as a weak character who is unable to think clearly for herself or to have any sense of individuality. Early in the play Ophelia says to her father, Polonius, “I do not know, my lord, what I should think”. This indicates that she is too weak-willed to have an identity of her own, which could indicate some type of mental illness or “madness.” Her father’s identity is her identity and this loss of identity propelled her further into madness. Ophelia’s madness is driven by the loss of the male influences in her life. According to Heather Brown, Ophelia “is Polonius’ pawn, Laertes’ chaste sister, and Hamlet’s lover. Once these male influences are removed and these descriptions no longer define Ophelia, she loses her identity and becomes mad.” Once her father is dead, she loses a major part of herself. Laertes’s expectation for her to be chaste, as well as Hamlet’s rejection further propel Ophelia into a state of madness fulled by sexual frustration. 

Madness is one of the main themes of Hamlet. Hamlet and Ophelia both display symptoms of madness, but each become mad for different reasons. Hamlet’s madness is fulled by his father’s death and his desire to seek revenge on the man who killed him. Ophelia’s madness stems from her lack of identity and her feelings of helplessness regarding her own life. While the death of Hamlet’s father made him angry enough to want revenge, Ophelia internalised the death of her father as a loss of personal identity. While these deaths both sparked madness in these characters, they each dealt with their madness in different ways. Thus, by touching on ‘taboo’ subjects, such as atheism and mental health within Hamlet, this allows us to consider the thoughts and emotions of the people in the 16th Century, comparing the differences but at the same time identifying with the characters of Hamlet. 

Advertisements

One thought on “Does Hamlet show that people in the 16th Century are just like us?

  1. Only now, at least in the UK, is mental health being dragged into the open. But it is only during the past 50 years or so that it has become the massive problem it is now. I believe that it is the completely unnatural life style demanded by western society which is the root of the problem. The solution now being proposed (spending more money) is, I believe, the very pollution which has caused the illness in the majority of cases.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s